Will Low Code Replace Developers?

29 August5 min read
Will Low Code Replace Developers?

According to the World Economic Forum, technology will provide 97 million new jobs by 2025, while automation will eliminate 85 million. Some engineers are hesitant about the proposal, given the rising popularity of low-code and no-code development methodologies across multiple large firms. According to developers, the assembly line's automation would make their employment obsolete.

Low-code and no-code development are resisted by some developers who fear they will eventually be superfluous. In this essay, we discuss the question of whether or not codes pose a threat to developers.

What is a Low Code?

Low code is a visual approach to software development that accelerates the entire process. Low code enables rapid deployment of various solutions by automating and abstracting each phase of the application lifecycle. Your firm may create solutions that match its objectives by dismantling conventional business and IT silos and fostering ongoing collaboration. 

Prevalence of Low Code in the Past Decades

The low-code no-code movement began its gradual revolution in the 1970s. But now, this is the norm across all software and application categories. In current enterprises across many different industries, low-code and no-code app development platforms are becoming more widespread.

Due to the increased need to speed up digital transformation, the market for low-code development platforms was valued at USD 16 billion in 2021 and will reach USD 159 billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 28.8%. In addition, according to the most current forecasts, the industry will increase to $45.5 billion by 2025. By 2024, low-code usage will be so widespread that software solutions will be developed globally 75% of the time, according to Gartner's research.

Pros and Cons of Low Code Development


Less Time Needed to Create an MVP

A low-code solution unquestionably expedites the production of the end product. It's also an excellent method for creating a minimal viable product (MVP) and figuring out what has to be changed or improved. Contrarily, if efficiency is your primary priority, there are better choices than designing complex software because it would take months of work. 


While complex development projects need a lot of time and money, low-code development is rapid and affordable. 

Less Testing

Only certain conditions can be used to test low-code solutions. Most key nodes are immediately tested and approved. However, when it comes to usability, accessibility, and spotting errors throughout the entire workflow, the strategy is virtually the same as with specially created software. 


Poor Security

A low-code solution makes it simple for anyone to develop helpful software. The simpler the software development process is, nevertheless, the more likely it is that your code may have errors. This implies that your software may contain system-wide security holes or hazards to data security. 

Less Scalable

A low-code platform is simple to use and speeds up project delivery. What happens if you wish to extend it, incorporate integrations from outside sources, or roll out fresh composite features? Comparable to switching platforms and hiring a development team during your project, complex development will take less time and cost less money. 

Limited Customization

Since they are intended for a large audience, low-code development tools lack customization, but it isn't easy to make anything that exactly satisfies every use case. But if a developer has a target market in mind and a clear business case, they are more likely to produce something unique and outstanding. 

Applications of Low-Code Solutions

The following four instances show when low- and no-code platforms are beneficial: 

1. While building an MVP, you must develop a minimum viable product soon. In this case, the essential advantage of a low-code platform is speed. 

2. When automating a manual process: Low-code or no-code solutions are your best bet if your objective is to cut costs by automating human processes. 

3. When starting with new platforms: Consider a situation where a business wants to offer VR (Virtual Reality) or AR (Augmented Reality) to its users but has never used the platforms before. In that case, a low-code platform can help the company attract new clients and increase the possibility that important KPIs like customer retention and satisfaction will be satisfied.

4. When migrating legacy apps: A low-code platform is a fantastic option for improving a legacy app's UI/UX for its current users. 

Is Low Code a Threat to Developers?

Non-technical teams can produce digital items because of low coding. So it shouldn't be a surprise that businesses are increasingly using low-code platforms, even though some programmers might see the development of this technology as a threat to their jobs. Although it is becoming increasingly popular, many engineers do not consider it dangerous. 

Low-code solutions can aid in creating customized software, but they still need to prepare to take their place. Of course, if low-code technologies become more sophisticated, this might alter in the future. They will only be able to do away with the demand for and necessity for software engineers, though. As with all innovation, they will only spur change and evolution in employment requirements. 


Without a doubt, low-code and no-code development solutions will democratize the industry, encouraging more people to try their hand at SaaS and software development. Even though the software may be destroying the earth, developers still control it. So, dear creators, if you hold it in your hands, it won't become a threat. You are and always will be the ones that create.