6 Oct · 4 min read
In the 21st century, projects need project management software that enables continuous monitoring, simplifies budget tracking, and encourages collaboration.
More than 70% of companies today are using agile methodologies – Scrum or Kanban. However, a lot of professionals are having a hard time distinguishing between the two approaches.
The Scrum methodology focuses on teamwork, accountability, and iterative progress to encourage people towards a well-defined goal. On the other hand, Kanban is a visual system for managing workflow throughout the process.
Even though we can work on both technologies simultaneously, companies often opt for any one of them. In this article, we will talk about the differences between Scrum and Kanban.
Since Scrum and Kanban are both agile methodologies and they both share a few common characteristics.
Both platforms limit Work in Progress (WIP) to promote agility and helps in dividing jobs into smaller manageable units.
Scheduling: During the Scrum approach, managers set sprints by determining clear deadlines for each aspect of the project. On the other hand, Kanban encourages continuity by setting deadlines pending with the team leader.
Roles and Responsibilities: In Scrum, every team member is assigned a specific task. However, in Kanban, roles for team members are not strictly determined, resulting in greater cooperation.
Improvisations: Scrum does not allow improvisations and changes in the middle of a sprint, while Kanban encourages modifications and promotes continuous adjustments.
Defining KPIs: The velocity of a sprint helps in understanding Scrum productivity. Since sprints are small pieces of work, they get executed very quickly. On the other hand, Kanban considers taking time to complete a large portion of the project.
Deliverability: Scrum works best with projects that have fixed deliverability whereas Kanban is better suited for flexible teams that need frequent changes whenever required.
We have already discussed the important features of Scrum and Kanban. Let us discuss the pros and cons of Scrum.
Shorter sprints: Since Scrum divides the work into smaller pieces, the job gets done faster and more efficiently.
Improved quality: As minor tasks are simpler to execute flawlessly, each sprint results in a better quality of work.
Enhanced accountability: The overseeing of each specific goal by individual team members strengthens accountability.
Unparalleled transparency: Every team member is aware of how the project is unfolding and the roles and responsibilities of a team member.
Goal-oriented work: This works best with a goal-oriented professional philosophy.
Focus-oriented: It is often considered an advantage but it is likely to become a con without a team of highly skilled and experienced professionals.
Work-pace issues: Weaker players in your team could slow down more agile members.
Handling Inaccuracies: Scrum-powered projects must be perfectly defined as otherwise; they might result in inaccuracies.
Kanban also comes with its sets of advantages and disadvantages.
Ease of use: Figuring out Kanban does not require years of experience in agile project management. It is a visually appealing platform that is beginner-friendly.
Flexibility: Kanban is highly flexible needed for broader projects that require real-time changes.
Collaboration: Unlike Scrum, Kanban encourages collaboration and ensures that the entire team works together and delivers the desired result.
Increased Productivity: This solution focuses on continuous delivery and increased productivity in larger project cycles.
Lack of focus: The lack of focus makes it easier to get distracted when using Kanban.
Complexity: Kanban boards can become complex resulting in clarity issues and confusion among team members.
Lack of timing: Kanban’s lack of timing parameters makes it less favorite among the project managers.
Choosing Kanban or Scrum framework could either be an entirely personal choice or depend upon project requirements. In the end, it's important to make sure that it’s a well-thought decision. If you’re confused about making the right choice, we would suggest you try both frameworks and figure out which worked well for you.
Below are the points to keep in mind before making the final decision: